Originally Posted by Cavalchesuda
Yep, it sounds like a very well structured course, and I guess structure is exactly what my chess self-study has always lacked....
|
That, ultimately, is probably it's main strength, yes. That is the greatest appeal to me, and why I like it so well. I'm not sure really how to describe it except that it is different from books in that, now that I realize it, books very often don't really
teach you chess. They just explain a principle, and then give several game fragments to try to illustrate it. This site really seems to teach a real understanding.
Like I said, my whole chess life, I've pretty much just studied fragments of books arbitrarily. Who knows how many holes I've left in my game that I'm not even aware of. With this proper structure, I find things much more encouraging.
Originally Posted by S4PIENT
M., would you recommend this site for a beginner, or is it for higher level players?
|
I can’t say I would be confident giving the course to a complete beginner. I would say a couple books, and perhaps a few tournament games of experiences would prepare them to get the most out of it. If they only learned the moves a couple months ago, I wouldn’t recommend the site. If they’re 1000-1200 or so, I think they can start to get quite a bit out of it. 1500, sure. The best way I can equate it, is if the player is to the level where he is ready to seriously study a Jeremy Silman book, then he ought to be ready for this site. If you wouldn’t give him Jeremy Silman yet, probably I would wait.
Originally Posted by ketchuplover
I'm glad you're enjoying it. I'll stay with my books 
|
Regardless if I had Kasparov himself teaching me daily, I would not give up my books. Books are Indispensable. I still keep them heavily in my curriculum. I consider this online site an added bonus, although, a very strong one.