I want anyone to recommend me some books but for rating 2000-2200
thx

I'm not at that level but I think you may want to look at a book titled:Chess Exam and Training Guide:Rate Yourself and Learn How to Improve In general I think books written for experts are a rare breed. Off the top of my head some authors worth investigating are John Watson,Andy Soltis,Jan Timman,and John Nunn. Good luck

Road to Chess Improvement by Alex Yermolinsky.
He won't give you any secret Russian training methods or recommend some opening that'll help you win more games or any of that nonsense. What he will do is tell you how and what to study just like the GM's do. He also warns you it'll require a lot of effort. At least he's honest.

The Serach for Chess Perfection by CJS Purdy
He explains things in such a clear, concise manner that sometimes it's amazing. I gave a friend rated mid-1600's a copy of the section on aids to seeing combinations and how to plan and in a couple months he was playing at the 1800 level. It's a bio, game collection and collection of his magazine articles. You can open it anywhere and learn something.

Game collections. Playing over games by your favorite player trying to guess the next move is an excellent way to see how the GM's do it. Even better for me are tournament books. Game collections are "best" games. Tmt. books let you see games that weren't good enough to make it into the books (most aren't) and it's instructive to watch how GM's defeat ordinary 2400's (Yermolinsky called them tomato cans) and IM's over ordinary masters. It makes you realize just how crappy 2000-2200 players are!

The Dvoretsky series is advanced enough that 2000+ would be a good time to jump in.

Opening Developments
Strategic Play
Tactical Play
Positional Play

Their level is a bit much for me but the one I have (Positional Play) I can still get useful stuff out of even if it is hard going.

Unless you feel you've got the endgame covered, Endgame Strategy (Shereshevsky) would be good as well.

Look at what you are passionate about and what are your weak points.

For most untitled players that area of weakness is the endgame. Anything that would help you hit get you to study endgame are not that bad for you.

Regarding game collections. Some players are more or less accessible than others. On the whole newer GMs tend to be less accessible. Players like Kasparov, Shirov, Anand and the other players born after 1960 are more subtle than the older players.

Indeed. I have a collection of Shirov's games and most of the time I'm just baffled. Reshevsky's games on the other hand are are much easier to comprehend. Even Botvinnik's. Or Capablanca's. If they can get dynamic compensation today's players are more willing to accept positional weaknesses that would have been totally unacceptable to the players of a generation ago

When I learned to play chess I had some books where ...e5 in the Sicilan was condemned as inferior. Then along came Boleslavsky with his variation and today it's the Sveshnikov. Each generation builds on the knowledge of their predecessors.

You are absolutely correct. The newer players also take their concepts for granted as well.

Although it is easy and accurate to discuss the effect of databases (usually Chessbase but certainly Chess Assistant) and chess engines; it is entirely appropriate to note the changes in middlegame and endgame theory.

I read a story where Kasparov was looking at the gallery proofs for John Nunn's Secrets of Pawnless Endings. He was mesmerized and almost forfeited a game for being too late. He was so inspired by what he found to be new, he won that game.

I have that book.