sponsor:
 |
|
11-04-2008, 11:05 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Posts: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Frequent stalemates
Most of my games are ending in stalemates! What should I do?
|
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 11:43 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Posts: 567
Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
|
Resign before there will be a stalemate.
Most of my stalemates come from when I have 10 seconds left on my clock (without a delay). If you aren't in serious time-trouble, then you should be calculating, and therefore you will always know when your opponent doesn't have a move.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2008, 06:56 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Posts: 2,156
Thanked 120 Times in 116 Posts
|
When you should be winning, with some kind of massive material advantage, make sure you check the guy with your move. Doesn't always work though, just calculating it all out is an infinitely better solution.
__________________
White:
- Ruy Lopez
- Sicilian Defense: Chekhover variation, Rossolimo variation, 2. ... e6 3. d4
- French Defense: Bogo-Winawer variation, Alekhine-Chatard attack
- Pirc Defense: Byrne variation
Black:
- Ruy Lopez: Modern Steinitz variation
- Two Knights Defense: Fritz variation, Ulvestadt variation
- King's Gambit: Falkbeer Countergambit: Nimzowitsch variation
- Tarrasch Defense
|
|
|
|
11-11-2008, 08:14 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Posts: 12
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Originally Posted by Ifiwereu
Most of my games are ending in stalemates! What should I do?
|
What kind of strategy are you using? I've had to force myself out of the habit of wreaking total destruction on my opponent so that I can avoid stalemates. I have a bad tendency to want to capture ALL of his pieces and then attack his King when he's extremely weak. I know it's a pitiful game strategy, but I'm still new. 
|
|
|
|
11-24-2008, 01:59 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Posts: 1,343
Thanked 46 Times in 45 Posts
|
What kind of stalemates? Not-enough-material stalemates? King-pawn vs King? Unnecessary amount of pieces?
__________________
Brick walls hurt, but are effective for banging against repeatedly. For future reference, cardboard walls are fun too 
Being a professional player is something akin to being a prostitute. First I played because other people did it. Then I played because I liked to play. And finally I played just for the money. - Benko
Procrastination: due date = do date
|
|
|
|
11-24-2008, 02:06 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Posts: 777
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
|
Stalemates occur as a result of improper planning.
Unless of course you initiated it.
__________________
http://www.planetchess.org
http://www.tacbase.com
http://www.akobian.com
"Players who fail to study tactics systematically tend to suffer from tactical blind-spots that plague them throughout their playing career, and thus they fail to realize their full potential." GM John Nunn.
Chess is 99 percent tactics. - Teichmann
Chess is 99% tactics - Alexei Shirov
"I absolutely agree with the well-known maxim: 'Chess is 99% tactics." GM Susan Polgar
|
|
|
|
01-01-2009, 06:21 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Posts: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think my stalemates were being created on account of the fact that the king was not being checked before checkmate occured. Windows Vista's chess game recognizes this. Usually, I trap the king against the edge of the board with my queen and a rook or two. If the king has no place to move and has not been checked that's when stalemate or draw happens.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2009, 11:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Posts: 2,259
Thanked 129 Times in 126 Posts
|
Yup, leaving him without a legal move when he's not in check is a stalemate. As Perseus suggested, simply making sure that every move is a check when you've got that type of overwhelming advantage is a good way to avoid this.
But eventually, you'll have to learn to plan better in these situations. I'd actually recommend the book "Silman's Complete Endgame Course" by Jeremy Silman to learn how to plan in the endgame better. The first chapter is pretty much entirely devoted to the topic of this thread. You can stop reading after that, and come back to the more advanced material when you feel you need it later on in your development as a player.
--Fromper
__________________
"Don't be afraid of ghosts! Always play the moves you want to play unless you see a genuine tactical drawback." --Grandmaster Neil McDonald
|
|
|
|
01-02-2009, 06:28 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Posts: 15
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
If you often accidentally stalemate your opponent, you could try some exercises against a chess program. For example, try to checkmate a lone king with two queens, using short time controls.
Or, using a board, set up a couple of white pieces in random places, and as quickly as possible, find all the places where a black king would be stalemate.
|
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 08:36 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Posts: 41
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Using too much force to check a king can lead to stalemate. For instance, too many queens (from promoted pawns) can lead to stalemate by offering too many attack angles. Resist the urge to go up by more than one queen more than your opponent; promote to a rook instead, or even a minor piece. If you have too many powerful pieces, leave something off in a corner, away from the action but available if needed. And leave your opponent with a piece that can move when you move to trap their king.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chess Links
|
If you would like to exchange links with ChessForums.org please contact
us
|
| Subscribe |
|
By subscribing to the ChessForums RSS feeds you can receive new posts in your favorite feedreader.







|
|