Originally Posted by Fromper
And I disagree with Octal that endgames shouldn't happen in blitz. He seems to be assuming that all blitz is based on trying risky lines that'll lead to quick wins or losses. Why? You can play solid lines that lead to slow, positional maneuvering and an eventual endgame, just at a faster time control. After all, if you don't play the same stuff in your blitz games as your slow games, then what are you learning?
--Fromper
|
I'm not quite sure how to respond to this, so I'm just going to throw you a mess of disorganized thoughts:
About 75% of the time when I play blitz I play the openings I would play in slow games.
Sacrifices are taken more often then not in blitz.
Blitz is about 5% positional consideration, 70% tactics, and 25% intuition.
Attacks just seem to happen so much more often.
If you where to annotate U2000 rated blitz games, you could probably attach a question mark to about half of the moves.
Anyway, I was being half serious when I said that, although I still think it is a valid point.