Originally Posted by king_sacrifice
I call my idea "Analysis Club".
Just as a book club has its members read and review the exact same book, our Analysis Club would play through and analyze the exact same game. After a certain amount of time (a week, two weeks, a month) we all share our findings in a thread - each thread has a specific name format. Here are two examples:
Analysis Club: Lasker - Capablanca, St. Petersburg 1914
Analysis Club: Karpov - Kasparov, game 23, 1987 WC match
I thought it would be fun to see what kind of different perspectives we get from our combined notes. It would be educational and fun for me personally to see what kind of mistakes I make in my variations.
Do you all like this idea?
|
Great Idea!
I'm in. This would, by comparison of analysis, be highly instructive to the participants by comparing how they value the various positions to the valuations of others.
I propose that we start with one of Anisotropy's and Fromper's games from their tourneys. (And other members.) This way we can help them improve, as opposed to analysing classic games.